Kass uses the feeling of repugnance to do just this. The Process of Cloning: Cloning is the process of creating a cell, cell product, or organism that is genetically identical to the unit from which it was derived. The nucleus of a mature and unfertilized egg is removed and replaced with a nucleus obtained from a specialized cell of an adult organism, which contains almost all the hereditary material.
A press release stated that they had successfully cloned a sheep from a single cell of an adult sheep.
Since then, cloning has become one of the most controversial and widely discussed topics. The issue that gets the greatest focus is human cloning, and there has been an onslaught of protests and people lobbying for a ban on it.
However, there is a real danger that prohibitions on cloning will open the door to inappropriate restrictions on accepted medical and genetic practices.
Therefore, the banning of cloning is unjust.
The most popular objection to human cloning is the assumption that science would be playing God if it were to create human clones. This argument refuses to accept the advantage of biological processes and to view the changes of the world.
Religious objections were once raised at the prospects of autopsies, anesthesia, artificial insemination, organ transplants, and other acts that seemed to be tampering with divine will. The issue of playing God has already arisen when a doctor selects a patient on a waiting list for transplant and leaves others to die, and Dangers of human cloning essay the doctor puts their patient under life support whenever they are in coma or they are near death.
The moral issue of cloning is similar to the past issue faced by the society such as nuclear energy, recombinant DNA, and the computer encryption.
There have always been religious and moral objections to new technologies and changes merely because they are different and unknown to humans.
One of the more eloquently stated fears about the loss of uniqueness is a consideration for the rights of the clone to a unique and untried genotype. Moreover, the cloned individual will be saddled with a genotype that has already lived. He will not be a fully surprise to the world, and other people are most likely to compare his performances in life with that of his clone source.
But the child who results from cloning will not be the same person as the clone source, even if the two share many physical characteristics.
Its uterine, early childhood, and overall rearing environment and experiences will be different. Given the importance for nurture in making a person who he is, the danger that the person cloned will lack a unique individuality is highly fanciful. Each human life is unique, born of a miracle that reaches beyond laboratory science.
Cloning can directly offer a means of curing diseases or often a technique that can extend means to acquiring new data for the sciences of embryology. Human cloning can also enable couples in, which one party has a serious hereditary disease, to reproduce without transmitting the disease to their offspring.
A baby girl is born free of the gene that causes Tay-Sachs disease, even though both her parents are carriers. In the embryonic cell from which she was cloned, the flawed gene was replaced with normal DNA.
Two years after Ian Wilmut has announced his discovery, a group of European scientists reported that they had cloned six calves using a new technique that allowed the animals to start life biologically younger than the aged cells from which they were derived. Like Dolly, the claves are clones of the original DNA donor, exact genetic copies rather than individual mixtures of male and female DNA.
But the cattle also differ from the sheep in one subtle but fundamental way. In Dolly the sheep, scientists found that cloned cells retained the age of the donor. This time, using cow egg cells, researchers modified donor cells in such a way that the egg rejuvenated the new cells and gave them traits of youthful cells.
This is one of the many ways in which human cloning can be beneficial to mankind."Italian, U.S. Scientists Unveil Human Cloning Effort" by Andrew Stern "'Genie Out of the Bottle' on Human Cloning" "Designer People: The Human Genetic Blueprint Has Been Drafted, Offering Both Perils and Opportunities for the Environment.
cloning becoming a reality. In fact, it is unrealistic to assume it will never happen. To deal with the implications of cloning, we should hesitate to consider the cost cloning would have on society as a whole.
Human cloning is unethical because we cannot know the results, because alters societal roles, and because it degrades humanity. Human Cloning Essay - Human Cloning Human Cloning comes with two dangerous processes, reproductive cloning (the creating of a new organism) and the therapeutic cloning (the creation of a new tissues or “other biological products”) which affects the ethics of human society.
Human Cloning, is it Ethical? Heaven L Collins Bryant & Stratton College Eng Research and Writing Mrs. Adams December 15, Human Cloning, is it Ethical? Some people wonder what it would be like to have a second one of them. In order to have a copy of someone human cloning would have to take place.
Human cloning, they argue, offers a new method for human control and self-improvement, by allowing families to have children free of specific genetic diseases or society to reproduce children with superior genetic endowments.
If there is any truth to the claim - and there is no evidence to suggest so - Zavos's attempt at human cloning was downright dangerous, they chorused. The child would die in the womb or be born with severe abnormalities, they said. The warning is supported by the high failure rates reported for cloning animals.